Hatch v. Raney
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County, dissolving' a preliminary injunction. H. Z. Austin, Judge. > ' The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The appeal is from an order dissolving a preliminary injunction that was issued on the filing of the complaint.
The action was brought to restrain defendants from interfering in any manner with plaintiffs in the use of a certain water ditch extending across the lands of defendant Sheldon J. Raney, plaintiffs claiming an easement therein, and also to quiet “plaintiffs’ title in and to said ditch and their right to run water therein over, across and through the lands of said defendant, Sheldon J. Raney.”
The alleged wrong of which complaint is made, the destruction of the ditch, had been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stewart v. Superior Court of San Diego Cty.California Supreme Court · 1893
- McDonald v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Gardner v. StroeverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Delger v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Marks v. Weinstock, Lubin & Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Allen v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees' International AllianceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- McManus v. KPAL Broadcasting Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Island Reclamation District No. 776 v. Floribel Alfalfa SyndicateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Dingley v. BucknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.