Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Stroever

California Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1889No. 13191PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Butte County refusing to dissolve an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

The complaint describes a public road “ extending from the Oroville and Miner’s Ranch public road northeasterly past the slaughter-house of defendant and the slaughter-house of plaintiff, to the residence of Nancy Cooper,” about seventy rods in length, situate in Butte County, and alleges that plaintiff is in possession of a slaughter-house on the south side of the road described, “ and that the only means of entrance and exit •to and from said slaughter-house to said public highway leading from Oroville to Miner’s Ranch, or any other public highway, is over and along said highway…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Delger v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Mechanics' Foundry v. RyallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mendelson v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hagen v. BethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Evans v. District Court of the Fifth Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Gardner v. StroeverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Gray v. Council of Newark & the Newark Water & Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API