Staten v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett
This is an appeal from a conviction of voluntary manslaughter, with punishment fixed at confinement in the State penitentiary for not more than five years.
The evidence admitted does not sustain the conviction. The State insists though that if certain evidence which was excluded by the trial judge was admitted that then the conviction would necessarily have to be affirmed. Of course we cannot consider this evidence that was excluded below. It is true that the evidence is physically in the record but from a legal standpoint it is not before us. The State then asks that we “pass upon the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jared v. FitzgeraldTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. Canadian Fur Trappers Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Buchanan v. NixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- McClung v. City of ElizabethtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
- Bradley v. Rock Gardens Utility Dist.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by35 opinions
- Shelley v. GipsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. RogersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
- Eady v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Wandersee v. Brellenthin Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- City of Memphis v. OvertonTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.