Legal Opinion

McClung v. City of Elizabethton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This suit was brought in June, 1932, by bondholders to enforce collection of bonds of the municipality which were in default in the payment of interest. No individual property owners were originally sued. But.a petition was later filed by a bondholders’ committee representing other holders of bonds in a large sum and by this petition the American Glanzstoff Corporation and certain other property owners were brought before the court.. It was charged that abortive attempts had been made by (1) exemption resolutions of the city council and (2) by enactment of the Legislature changing the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Hodges v. Hamblen CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  3. General Securities Co. v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Harrell v. American Home Mortgage Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State Ex Rel. Allen v. American Glanzstoff Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Staten v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Coleman v. HenryTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Ball v. CooterTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Woodroof v. City of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
  5. Marshall v. First National Bank of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API