Legal Opinion

City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MIRARCHI, Jr., Senior Judge.

Before this Court are the consolidated appeals of the City of Pittsburgh (Employer) from two orders of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decisions of Workers’ Compensation Judges (WCJ) denying its petitions to terminate the benefits of Lawrence Wiefling and Warren Broz (collectively, Claimants). The issue is whether Employer is precluded from petitioning for termination or modification of Claimants’ workers’ compensation benefits where supplemental agreements entered into by Employer and Claimants provided that Claimants were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Cunningham v. COM., PENN. ST. POLICESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Kohut v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Mason v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Adams v. Lawrence Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Schachter v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Wieczorkowski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Corrections v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API