Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth, Department of Corrections v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 2010Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

Because it is against our Supreme Court’s decision in Cohen v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia), 589 Pa. 498, 909 A.2d 1261 (2006), which is virtually identical to this case, I disagree with the majority’s holding that the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) was collaterally estopped from determining that Brenda Wagner-Stover (Claimant) continued to suffer from work-related injuries after the Department of Corrections (Department) found the opposite in Claimant’s Act 632 hearing. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

This appeal…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Balent v. City of Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Rue v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Khan v. State Board of Auctioneer ExaminersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Campbell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Bortz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API