Legal Opinion

Schachter v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 2006No. 320 C.D. 2006PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

Joseph Schachter (Claimant) petitions for review of an adjudication of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) denying his claim for attorney’s fees for unreasonable contest. In doing so, the Board reversed, in part, the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) awarding such fees. In this case we consider whether an impairment rating evaluation is res judicata as to the permanency of a claimant’s disability for purposes of a subsequently filed termination petition. The Board found that it was not. We agree and will affirm the Board’s order.

Claimant was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Udvari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Wieczorkowski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. McGuire v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. County of Delaware v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Elberson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Diehl v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Harrison v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Diehl v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Weismantle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API