Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. COM., PENN. ST. POLICE

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1986No. 73 M.D. Appeal Docket 1984PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

In this case we revisit an issue recently addressed in Palmeri v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State Police, 508 Pa. 544, 499 A.2d 278 (1985), concerning the burden of proof required to terminate benefits under the Heart and Lung Act, Act of June 28, 1935, P.L. 477 as amended, 53 P.S. § 637 (hereinafter the “Act”). In Palmeri we determined the standard of proof to be that evidence which establishes to a “scientific probability” that the employee’s disability is permanent. Today we re-examine that standard and its practical ramifications.

I

The appellee,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Creighan v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. Harmar Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Wisniewski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Colyer v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Camaione v. Borough of LatrobeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Brandt v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API