Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. Coburn
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Superior Court of Marion County.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C. C.
— It is not disputed that the appellant holds all the rights of the Indianapolis and Bellefontaine Railroad Company to the land in controversy in this suit. All the defendants except Thomas A. Hendricks and wife, Aquilla Parker and Mrs. Lingenfelter, are the heirs at law of Henry P. Coburn. Hendricks and wife and Parker and Mrs. Lingenfelter claim under conveyances made by the Coburn heirs in 1859, 1861 and 1862.
*558The land in controversy is a strip eighty feet wide extending through out-block No. 182 in Marion county, Indiana. This out-block belonged to Henry P. Coburn, who…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Water Works Co. v. BurkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Thompson v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Lindsey v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Horner v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Stevens v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Tazian v. ClineIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Richard S. Brunt Trust v. PlantzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Mammoth Cave National Park Ass'n v. State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.