Richard S. Brunt Trust v. Plantz
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
In the late 1800's, the Terre Haute and Logansport Railroad (railroad) acquired for railroad purposes a right-of-way over five parcels of land. It maintained commercial railroading operations over this right-of-way until conveyance of the right-of-way to Penn Central Corporation (Penn Central). Shortly thereafter, Penn Central abandoned all railroading operations over the right-of-way and conveyed it to the Richard S. Brunt Trust (Brunt). To protect this acquired interest, Brunt filed a complaint for damages and to enjoin the neighboring landowners from removing trees from the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Brookbank v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GeiselIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Schnabel v. County of Du PageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Quick v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Brown v. Penn Central Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Clark v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. LewellenIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Hefty v. All Other Members of the Certified Settlement ClassIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.