Legal Opinion

Richard S. Brunt Trust v. Plantz

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1983No. 3-583A132PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

In the late 1800's, the Terre Haute and Logansport Railroad (railroad) acquired for railroad purposes a right-of-way over five parcels of land. It maintained commercial railroading operations over this right-of-way until conveyance of the right-of-way to Penn Central Corporation (Penn Central). Shortly thereafter, Penn Central abandoned all railroading operations over the right-of-way and conveyed it to the Richard S. Brunt Trust (Brunt). To protect this acquired interest, Brunt filed a complaint for damages and to enjoin the neighboring landowners from removing trees from the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Brookbank v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GeiselIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Schnabel v. County of Du PageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Quick v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Brown v. Penn Central Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Clark v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. LewellenIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Hefty v. All Other Members of the Certified Settlement ClassIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API