Panagotacos v. Bank of America
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANLON, P. J.
In this breach of contract action, James and Diane Panagotacos (appellants) appeal from the summary judgment entered in favor of respondent Bank of America. Appellants contend that triable issues of fact exist as to whether they entered into a binding contract to purchase real property and whether respondent is liable for emotional distress damages due to its violation of Civil Code section 2941. We affirm.
Factual Background
In August 1993, appellants located a house in Galaxidi, Greece that they wanted to buy. On August 26, 1993, the Geselschaps, the sellers of the house,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Apablasa v. Merritt & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Pintor v. OngCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carlton v. QuintCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Co. v. Hock Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Helm Financial Corp. v. Iowa Northern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002
- J.B.B. Inv. Partners Ltd. v. Fair, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Johnson v. Alameda County Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.