People v. Lineberger
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
During pretrial and trial proceedings, defendant successfully requested on two occasions that assigned counsel be relieved based on allegations of misfeasance or nonfeasance. After the unfavorable jury verdict, he adamantly refused the continued services of his third assigned attorney for sentencing and despite counsel’s competence, defendant refused to cooperate with him. At a subsequent sentencing hearing, defendant obstinately refused to enter the courtroom after asserting that he had fired his attorney…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. ArroyoNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. WilkersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. SantosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. CoppinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.