People v. Arroyo
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Wesley, J.
This appeal requires us to address a classic constitutional dilemma — the inherent conflict between a defendant’s right to counsel and the right of self-representation.
After a jury trial, defendant Michael Arroyo was convicted of robbery in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree. During trial, Arroyo informed Supreme Court of his desire to proceed pro se, expressing dissatisfaction with his at torney’s efforts on his behalf. After inquiring whether defendant “really want[ed]” to represent himself, the court noted:
“you have a right to do it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- People v. McIntyreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. SlaughterNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by178 opinions
- People v. ProvidenceNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. CrampeNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- In the Matter of Kathleen K.New York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. RolleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.