Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1986PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Prior to jury selection in this case, defendant moved to proceed without representation of counsel. Without determining whether this request was knowingly and intelligently made, the trial court initially granted the motion, but thereafter ordered assigned counsel to take part in the proceeding after defendant indicated his intention to remain mute.

"A defendant in a criminal case may invoke the right to defend pro se provided: (1) the request is unequivocal and timely asserted, (2)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. People v. McIntyreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. VivenzioNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. People v. ArroyoNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. SlaughterNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. People v. Baghai-KermaniNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API