Legal Opinion

Hellard v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1982PublishedCited by 1,209 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROCK, Justice.

This is a proceeding for post conviction relief in which the prisoner, Hellard, attempts to have his conviction for armed robbery set aside upon allegations that his trial counsel, Mr. William Morrell, in his representation of the petitioner did not measure up to the standard of competence for counsel as set out by this Court in Baxter v. Rose, Tenn., 523 S.W.2d 930 (1975). The trial court sustained the petitioner’s insistence, holding that the Baxter standard was applicable to this case and that Mr. Morrell, in his representation of the defendant, “did not measure up to…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,209 opinions

  1. State v. BurnsTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Goad v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Henley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Adkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  5. State v. MelsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1989

1,204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API