Legal Opinion

Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Puckett

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 16, 1935No. 10896PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In the briefs filed for the plaintiffs in error it is conceded that the plaintiff’s petition was sufficient to show that each loan was infected with usury, and that after forfeiting the interest and other unlawful charges the plaintiff has fully paid the amounts of principal actually received by him, as alleged in the first count, and that the allegations made in each count are sufficient to state a cause of action, unless the plaintiff’s claim for credits is barred by limitation. The petition shows upon its face that all payments were made…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Equitable Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. DottenheimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Bailey v. LumpkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
  4. Johnson v. Southern Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Atlanta Savings Bank v. SpencerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Simpson v. ChartersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Whildon L. Moyer v. Citicorp Homeowners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Gold Kist, Inc. v. McNairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Richard Doyle v. Southern Guaranty Corporation, Jimmy E. Wood v. Fort Wayne Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Hartsfield Co. v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API