Legal Opinion

Kourouma v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 23, 2013No. 11-1283PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH.

GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge:

In a summary disposition, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) ordered energy trader Moussa Kourouma to pay a $50,000 civil penalty because he had made false statements and material omissions in forms he filed with the Commission and a market operator the Commission regulates. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Kourouma’s challenge to the order.

I

The Federal Power Act (FPA) grants FERC the authority to regulate the activity of traders who participate in energy markets. See 16 U.S.C. §§ 791a-825r. To…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Citizens for Allegan County, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, City of Allegan, Michigan, Consumers Power Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. City Power Marketing, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. Sw. Pub. Serv. Co. v. N.M. Pub. Regul. Comm'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API