Kourouma v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH.
GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge:
In a summary disposition, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) ordered energy trader Moussa Kourouma to pay a $50,000 civil penalty because he had made false statements and material omissions in forms he filed with the Commission and a market operator the Commission regulates. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Kourouma’s challenge to the order.
I
The Federal Power Act (FPA) grants FERC the authority to regulate the activity of traders who participate in energy markets. See 16 U.S.C. §§ 791a-825r. To…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Citizens for Allegan County, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, City of Allegan, Michigan, Consumers Power Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. City Power Marketing, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Sw. Pub. Serv. Co. v. N.M. Pub. Regul. Comm'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2025