Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. City Power Marketing, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge
Before the Court is [36] defendant City Power Marketing’s Rule 56(d) motion for *154discovery. For the following reasons, City Power’s motion for discovery is granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
The Court’s August 10, 2016 memorandum opinion discusses at length the complex background of this case, including the workings of the energy markets at issue and the alleged manipulative trades made by City Power Marketing. See Aug. 10, 2016 Mem. Op. [ECF No. 25] at 1-16. Rather than repeat that discussion here, the Court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grimes Ex Rel. Estate of Grimes v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Pardo-Kronemann v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Converting v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- USA, ex rel Brady Folliard v. Government AcquisitionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Maxim Power Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cogdell v. MurphyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Suarez v. Compass Coffee LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025