Legal Opinion

Dignity Health v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Ariz.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 11, 2019No. 1 CA-CV 18-0292PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THUMMA, Chief Judge:

*745¶1 The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether payments under optional medical payments coverage in an automobile insurance policy (what the parties call "medpay coverage") are "health insurance" and, therefore, not subject to a health care provider lien. As discussed below, because medpay coverage is not health insurance for purposes of the lien statute, those payments are subject to the health care provider lien. Accordingly, the grant of defendant Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona's motion to dismiss is vacated and this matter is remanded.

FACTS1 AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Coleman v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Van Loan v. Van LoanArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grunwald v. Scottsdale HealthcareCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API