Legal Opinion

Houston v. Lundy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 17, 1932No. 21758PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. A purchaser of a negotiable note, although with notice, either express or constructive, of equities and defenses as between the maker and the original payee, is protected in his title and may recover on it, if he purchased, even without recourse, from one who took it, bona fide and without notice, from the original payee. Civil Code (1910), § 4535; Burch v. Pope, 114 Ga. 334 (40 S. E. 227) ; Weil v. Carswell, 119 Ga. 873 (47 S. E. 217) ; Stamper v. Hayes, 25 Ga. 546; Wade v. Elliott, 11 Ga. App. 646 (75 S. E. 989) ; Day v. Rogers, 7 Ga. App. 535 (67 S. E. 279) ; Branch v. Dublin & Laurens…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burch v. PopeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Wade v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Stamper v. HayesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
  4. Weil v. CarswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Branch v. Dublin & Laurens BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nottingham v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API