Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wells

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 3, 1969No. 5-4794PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

This case involves the liability of appellee upon a promissory note executed by him on December 21, 1959. The principal question involved is whether appellant who sued on the note was entitled to a directed verdict as a holder who had all the rights of a holder in due course. Since we agree with appellant on this point, it is unnecessary that we consider any of the other points raised.

Appellee Wells purchased a bulldozer from Kern-Limerick, Inc., on or about the date the note was executed. Appellee traded another piece of equipment as part of the down payment and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Transbel Investment Co., Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Toll v. Monitor Binding & Printing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. Smith v. Nelson Land & Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  4. Gormany v. RyanTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  5. George Blow v. H. Max Ammerman, George Blow v. A. L. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weast v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Head v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API