United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wells
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
This case involves the liability of appellee upon a promissory note executed by him on December 21, 1959. The principal question involved is whether appellant who sued on the note was entitled to a directed verdict as a holder who had all the rights of a holder in due course. Since we agree with appellant on this point, it is unnecessary that we consider any of the other points raised.
Appellee Wells purchased a bulldozer from Kern-Limerick, Inc., on or about the date the note was executed. Appellee traded another piece of equipment as part of the down payment and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Transbel Investment Co., Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Toll v. Monitor Binding & Printing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Smith v. Nelson Land & Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Gormany v. RyanTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- George Blow v. H. Max Ammerman, George Blow v. A. L. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weast v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Head v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970