Legal Opinion

Branch v. Dublin & Laurens Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 14, 1917No. 8626PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Dublin — Judge Flynt. March 10, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

1. A purchaser of a negotiable note, although with notice either express or constructive of equities and defenses as between the maker and the original payee, is protected in his title and may recover on it, if he purchased, even without recourse, from one who took it, bona fide and without notice, from the original payee. Civil Code (1910), §4535; Burch v. Pope, 114 Ga. 334 (40 S. E. 227); Weil v. Carswell, 119 Ga. 873 (47 S. E. 217); Wade v. Elliott, 11 Ga. App. 646 (75 S. E. 989); Day v. Rogers, 7 Ga. App. 535 (67 S. E. 279).

2. The court did not err in excluding the testimony complained…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burch v. PopeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Wade v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Weil v. CarswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Day v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Houston v. LundyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Luke v. BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. North Georgia Trust & Banking Co. v. HulmeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API