Legal Opinion

Nottingham v. West

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 25, 1943No. 30077PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The motion for new trial states that the court directed a verdict for the plaintiff on the theory that even though the duly-recorded senior lien or bill of sale, dated January 25, 1937, from Arthur -Preston to Macon Production Credit Association, was superior to the retention-of-titlé contract from Arthur Preston to the plaintiff, Mrs. E. T. Nottingham had actual knowledge of the plaintiff’s 1934 contract before the transfer to her of the bill of sale from the Macon Production Credit Association, and therefore she got no title through her foreclosure.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whittington v. Doe ex dem. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
  2. Chafin v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Guthrie v. HendleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. WardlawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Darby v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rustin Oldsmobile, Inc. v. KendricksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Arnold v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Wallis v. McMurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Fulton County v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Fulton County v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API