Hannah & Lay Mercantile Co. v. Mosser
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Grand Traverse. (Corbett, J.) Bills to enforce mechanics’ liens. Defendants Sproul & McGurrin and J. W. Travis & Son filed answers in the nature of cross-bills asking like relief. Defendant railway company appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
In June, 1893, the defendant railway company entered into a contract with John G. Mosser, by which he was to construct an eating house for the company at Traverse City, according to plans and specifications agreed upon, for the sum of $3,397. This included the furnishing by Mosser of all materials as well as all labor. Mosser commenced the construction of the eating house in June, and had substantially completed it on August 35. On July 14 the company paid him $1,500, and on August 38 the sum of $1,500; leaving a balance, including extras,.of $568.03. On receiving the last payment, Mosser…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gibbs v. HanchetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- McDermott v. Board of Police for Metropolitan Police DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1857
- Ryan v. KellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1880
- Sheridan v. CameronMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Carney v. TullyIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Smalley v. Northwestern Terra-Cotta Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- O'Kane v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Casserly v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Beck v. Delta Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Spartan Asphalt Paving Co. v. Grand Ledge Mobile Home ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.