Legal Opinion
Daryl L. Johnson v. Cambridge Industries, Incorporated and Meridian Automotive Systems, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 2, 2003No. 02-1749PublishedCited by 530 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.
Not every genuine difficulty on the job amounts to impermissible discrimination in violation of federal statutes. Instead, distinctions like the difference between an “adverse employment action” and lesser problems, or between an employee’s actual performance and the employer’s percep tion of that performance, abound. When Daryl Johnson sued his current employer, Meridian Automotive Systems, Inc., as well as its predecessor Cambridge Industries, Inc., alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., the district court…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by530 opinions
- Arnett v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Tara Luevano v. Walmart Stores, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Otis Grant v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Thomas Flannery v. Recording Industry Association of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Siegel v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
525 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.