Legal Opinion
Israel Bio-Engineering Project v. Amgen Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 29, 2007No. 2006-1218PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SARIS, District Judge.
This appeal involves a complex dispute over the ownership of a patent. Plaintiff-Appellant Israel Bio-Engineering Project (“IBEP”) appeals from a judgment in a patent infringement action granting Defendant-Appellee Yeda Research and Development Company, Ltd.’s (“Yeda”) motion for summary judgment on the ground that IBEP lacked standing to bring the suit because it did not have sole ownership of the patent. This court affirms.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
1. Four Contracts
This dispute over ownership of the patent involves four inter-related contracts. Yeda is an Israeli corporation…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Robert Conroy v. Reebok International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Corus Staal BV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- SiRF Technology, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Predator International, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- DDB Technologies, L.L.C. v. MLB Advanced Media, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.