Legal Opinion
SiRF Technology, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 12, 2010No. 2009-1262PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
SiRF Technology, Inc. (“SiRF”), E-TEN Information Systems Co., Ltd. (“E-TEN”), Pharos Science & Applications, Inc. (“Pharos”), MiTAC International Corp. (“MiTAC”), and Mio Technology Limited, USA (“Mio”) (collectively, “appellants”) appeal from a decision of the International Trade Commission (“Commission”). The Commission found that appellants violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1337) through the unlawful importation, sale for importation, and sale after importation of certain Global Positioning System (“GPS”) devices and products containing these…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- BMC Resources, Inc. v. Paymentech, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- In Re BilskiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Muniauction, Inc. v. Thomson Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Bancorp Services, L.L.C. v. Sun Life Assurance Co. Of Canada (u.s.)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Dealertrack, Inc. v. HuberCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.