DDB Technologies, L.L.C. v. MLB Advanced Media, L.P.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Opinion dissenting in part and concurring in part filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Appellant DDB Technologies, L.L.C. (“DDB”) appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The district court dismissed DDB’s patent infringement suit against MLB Advanced Media, L.P. (“MLBAM”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We hold that the district court correctly held that DDB’s asserted statute of limitations and equitable defenses were not available and that no jury trial was required…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- SiRF Technology, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. v. NAVINTA LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Erie Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Funds in the Amount of $239,400Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.