Dorsey v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
In this case petitioners Donnie Dorsey and Roscoe Dorsey contend that a trial court afforded them more due process of law than they believe they were entitled to receive in a contempt matter and hence that the court was deprived of jurisdiction, making their convictions nullities. We shall reject their contentions, including claims that there was insufficient evidence to conclude that court proceedings were disrupted and that they were responsible for any part of the disturbance.
I The case
Maryland Rule P4 concerns constructive contempt. It provides that such proceedings "may be instituted by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Johnson v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- In Re Special Investigation No. 281Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Scott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Bahena v. FosterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Eagan v. AydCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.