Legal Opinion

Parker v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 7, 1995No. 99PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

This case concerns the nature and scope of judicial immunity from tort actions, both under Maryland law and under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

I

The facts are not in dispute. On April 14, 1988, Doris E. Parker was convicted in the District Court of Maryland of driving in excess of the speed limit, was fined $150, and was assessed $5 in court costs. Parker appealed her conviction to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, and a de novo appeal in that court was scheduled for July 26, 1988. Upon Parker’s failure to appear on that date, the circuit court determined that she had waived her right…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Adam Ostrzenski, M.D. v. Mark S. Seigel, M.D., Adam Ostrzenski, M.D. v. Mark S. Seigel, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Lee v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Edward Nero v. Marilyn MosbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  5. Lovelace v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API