Legal Opinion

Pittston Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 18, 2004No. Nos. 02-2199, 02-2200, 03-1351PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge TRAXLER joined. Chief Judge WILKINS wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

OPINION

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:

These appeals challenge the constitutionality of the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefits Act of 1992 (the “Coal Act”), 26 U.S.C. §§ 9701-9722. In response to severe financial difficulties that were undermining the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreements (“NBCWAs”) — collective bargaining agreements between the Bituminous Coal Operators’ Association and the United Mine Workers of America,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Rock v. McHughDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  2. United States Steel Corp. v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Cochran v. Volvo Group North America, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2013
  4. Association of American Railroads v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  5. New Mexico v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API