Legal Opinion
Reliance Realty Co. v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 15, 1930No. 19628PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) While it is true that if the writings sued on in the instant case should be treated as Florida contracts, the laws of Florida should govern in determining the validity and effect of the agreements, yet, since no law of that State has been pleaded, the contracts are to be interpreted by the applicable principles of law of force in this State. Civil Code (1910), § 8; Massachusetts Benefit Life Assn. v. Robinson, 104 Ga. 256 (8) (30 S. E. 918, 42 L. R. A. 261); Bailey v. Devine, 123 Ga. *126653 (1) (51 S. E. 603, 107 Am. St. R. 153); Post v. Atlantic Coast…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass'n v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Loud v. Pomona Land & Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Slaton v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Hogan v. KyleWashington Supreme Court · 1894
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lefkoff v. SicroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Trustees of Jesse Parker Williams Hospital v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Float-Away Door Company and National Surety Company v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Green v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Archibald Hardware Co. v. GiffordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.