Archibald Hardware Co. v. Gifford
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. Where a note is payable in installments, a purchaser who acquires the note after a default as to one of such installments, which is shown by the instrument itself, is not a holder in due course, but takes the instrument with notice of its dishonor, and his right as a holder is subject to the equities between the original parties. Beasley Hardware Co. v. Stevens, 42 Ga. App. 114 (155 S. E. 67).
2. In a suit by an indorsee upon a promissory note payable in installments, where there was an issue as to whether the plaintiff acquired the note before or after a default which occurred on February…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Black v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Schmidt v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Morris v. McKeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Town of Douglasville v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Reliance Realty Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bliss v. California Cooperative ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Verner v. McLartySupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Christie v. BassfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Northside Building & Investment Co. v. Finance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Greenberg v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.