Legal Opinion

Archibald Hardware Co. v. Gifford

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 19, 1932No. 21639PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Where a note is payable in installments, a purchaser who acquires the note after a default as to one of such installments, which is shown by the instrument itself, is not a holder in due course, but takes the instrument with notice of its dishonor, and his right as a holder is subject to the equities between the original parties. Beasley Hardware Co. v. Stevens, 42 Ga. App. 114 (155 S. E. 67).

2. In a suit by an indorsee upon a promissory note payable in installments, where there was an issue as to whether the plaintiff acquired the note before or after a default which occurred on February…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Black v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Schmidt v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Morris v. McKeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. Town of Douglasville v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  5. Reliance Realty Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bliss v. California Cooperative ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Verner v. McLartySupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  3. Christie v. BassfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. Northside Building & Investment Co. v. Finance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  5. Greenberg v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API