Legal Opinion

de Jongh v. de Jongh

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMark Costantino, J.

In a matrimonial action which has been resolved by a final judgment providing for the payment to the plaintiff of alimony in the sum of $20 a week, plaintiff moves pursuant to the newly enacted provisions of section 49-b of the Personal Property Law (L. 1958, ch. 659), for an order directing the defendant’s employer to deduct from his salary, commissions, etc; the sum of $20 a week, plus any additional sum the court may order by reason of back alimony due the plaintiff.

Briefly, the petitioner alleges that since July, 1957 the defendant has failed to forward the alimony decreed by the judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Durlacher v. DurlacherNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Durlacher v. DurlacherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  3. Ageloff v. AgeloffNew York Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lo Cascio v. Lo CascioNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Doe v. DoeNew York City Family Court · 1962
  3. Kenney v. KenneyNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People ex rel. Kenney v. KenneyNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People ex rel. Wcisel v. WciselNew York Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API