Legal Opinion
Durlacher v. Durlacher
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 1940PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBernstein, J.
The plaintiff seeks an order, under section 1171-b of the Civil Practice Act, directing the clerk of the court to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the sum of $833.33, representing one month’s arrears of alimony due to the plaintiff under a judgment of separation between the parties entered herein on February 7, 1934. At the date of the judgment both parties were residents of New York and the plaintiff claims that they still are such residents, but .that the defendant, though in business in New York city, is presently sojourning at Lake Tahoe, Nev. Because…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thayer v. ThayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Doncourt v. DoncourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Doncourt v. DoncourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Harris v. . ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- White v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
3Cited by22 opinions
- Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Haas v. HaasSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Durlacher v. DurlacherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Cukor v. CukorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946
- Gehring v. GehringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.