Legal Opinion

Durlacher v. Durlacher

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 10, 1941No. 9777PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from that part of a judgment of the district court denying to appellant recovery on a judgment of the supreme court of the State of New York, recovered in that court in a suit for separation and maintenance brought there by the appellant, then wife, hereafter called Helen, against the appellee, then her husband, hereafter called Simon.

A prior judgment for separation contained an order that Simon should pay Helen $833.33 per month for her support. The New York law (Sec. 1171-b of Civil Practice Act, Ch. 431, Laws of 1939) provides that, upon a noticed…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Mills v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. SillimanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Summers v. SummersNevada Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Bassett v. BassettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  4. Ageloff v. AgeloffNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  5. de Jongh v. de JonghNew York Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API