Legal Opinion

Doe v. Doe

New York City Family Court

Decided November 20, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard L. Midonick, J.

This memorandum is written for the purpose of extending the use of payroll deduction orders directed to employers for the support of wives and children of their employees.

This court is frequently faced by the undesirable alternatives of compelling a defaulting husband and father to comply with an order of support by committing him to jail forthwith (Family Ct. Act, § 454); by suspending such order of commitment on condition that the respondent post cash bond or other security and comply in the future (Family Ct. Act, § 455); by ordering probation for respondent under conditions of posting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. de Jongh v. de JonghNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Langus v. LangusNew York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beahm v. BeahmNew York City Family Court · 1965
  2. Commissioner of Social Services v. Roberto G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. People ex rel. Kenney v. KenneyNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Angela G. v. Roberto G.New York City Family Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API