Brock v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
The first special ground, designated as ground 4, complains that the trial judge nowhere in his charge sufficiently defined reasonable doubt, nor correctly charged on the presumption of innocence. Where the court charges in effect that the defendant is presumed in law to be innocent until and unless the evidence satisfies the minds and consciences of the jury beyond a reasonable doubt of his guilt, and that, if they do not believe he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense charged, it is their duty to acquit, the words “reasonable doubt” are plain and it is not necessary to further…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Reddick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Suddeth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Battle v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Kryder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Farmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Barnum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- DeNamur v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.