Legal Opinion

Stoughton Trailers, Inc. v. Henkel Corp.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 27, 1997No. 96-C-580-CPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRABB, District Judge.

Plaintiff Stoughton Trailers, Inc. decided that it needed to expand and enhance its capacity to paint the trailers it sells to the trucking industry. After evaluating the market, plaintiff settled on a painting process offered by defendant Henkel Corporation. Although defendant did not install the painting system required to apply its Autophoret ic® paint chemicals, it discussed the performance specifications of the system with plaintiff. The system never worked properly and plaintiff sued defendant on a variety of contract and tort claims. Defendant has moved for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. A. E. Investment Corp. v. Link Builders, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Rockweit v. SenecalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Northridge Co. v. W.R. Grace & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Werwinski v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Daanen & Janssen, Inc. v. Cedarapids, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Alejandre v. BullWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Rich Products Corp. v. Kemutec, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API