Daanen & Janssen, Inc. v. Cedarapids, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonald W. Steinmetz, J.
¶1. This case is before the court on a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 821.01 and Circuit Rule 52. The question certified to this court is: In the absence of privity, 1 does the economic loss doctrine bar a remote commercial purchaser from recovering economic losses from a manufacturer under theories of strict liability and negligence? After reviewing the policies on which this and other courts have relied when employing the economic loss doctrine, and applying those underlying policies to this case, we answer the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Casa Clara Condo. Ass'n v. Charley Toppino and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. American Girl, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Kaloti Enterprises, Inc. v. Kellogg Sales Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- BRW, Inc. v. Dufficy & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.