Legal Opinion

Alejandre v. Bull

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2007No. 76274-1PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1 — Petitioner Mary M. Bull sold a house to the respondents, Arturo and Norma Alejandre. The Ale-jandres subsequently learned the septic system was defective and sued Ms. Bull for fraudulently or negligently misrepresenting its condition. The trial court dismissed the Alejandres’ claims after they rested their case, determining as a matter of law that the Alejandres had failed to prove their claims and that the claims are barred by the economic loss rule. The Court of Appeals reversed, concluding that sufficient evidence was presented in support of the claims and that the economic loss rule…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Elcon Construction, Inc. v. Eastern Washington UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. AFFILIATED FM v. LTK Consulting ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Affiliated FM Insurance v. LTK Consulting Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2010

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API