Anthony Cacace v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Anthony Cacace was convicted on a one-count indictment of conspiracy to distribute cocaine hydrochloride in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. On direct appeal he asserted that an affidavit of application securing wiretap authorization did not comply with 18 U.S.C. § 2518(l)(c). This court found compliance and affirmed the conviction. United States v. Cacace, 5 Cir., 529 F.2d 1167, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 841, 97 S.Ct. 115, 50 L.Ed.2d 109 (1976). Cacace now appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We find no merit in his contentions and affirm.
Ca…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Regino PalaciosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Noble C. BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Benton Franklin Thomas and Joseph Thomas OlivetiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Anthony CacaceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. BermeaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Edward Marx, Frank Sladek and Keith HerringCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. BermeaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Peter KreimesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Armando Garcia and Leonardo SorzanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.