Legal Opinion

United States v. Anthony Cacace

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 19, 1976No. 75--3647PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, convicted of conspiring to distribute cocaine hydrochloride, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (1970), challenges the lower court’s refusal to suppress intercepted wire communications. He complains that the affidavit of application securing the wiretap authorization failed to comply with the federal and state statutory requirement that the affidavit include a

full and complete statement as to whether or not other investigative procedures have been tried and failed or why they reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried or to be too dangerous.

18 U.S.C. § 2518(l)(c) (1970);…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. HydeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. James M. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. CostelloDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  4. Anthony Cacace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. John Vincent Cifarelli, and Charles William Ebeling, A/K/A Robert Ebeling, A/K/A Bob EbelingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API