Legal Opinion
Heaning v. NYNEX-New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 12, 1996No. 95 Civ. 8111 (SS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SOTOMAYOR, District Judge.
The original complaint in this action, filed in state court, advanced two claims against NYNEX Corporation (“NYNEX” or “the Company”), both of which related to plaintiff’s discharge from the Company. First, plaintiff claimed that his employment was terminated without “just cause,” and that NYNEX therefore violated the terms of a collective bargaining agreement (the “CBA”) entered into between the Company and plaintiff’s union. Second, plaintiff asserted that NYNEX breached a duty of confiden tiality owed to him by releasing certain of his personnel…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wilds v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Fisk v. LettermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Beckman v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Peacock v. Suffolk Bus Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Parker v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.