Legal Opinion

People v. Appellate Department of Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1936No. L. A. No. 15853PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The petitioner seeks by this proceeding to prohibit the respondent appellate department from entertaining a certain appeal pending before it.

Golden State Motors and one Oliver Pezel were convicted in the municipal court of the city of Los Angeles of a violation of section 654a of the Penal Code. Within due time and on February 1, 1936, they filed a written notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction. On February 5, 1936, they served and filed the reporter’s transcript on appeal which was “settled” as the statement on appeal by the judge of the municipal court on February 13,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Mack v. JastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Keaton v. Mun. Court of L.A.California Supreme Court · 1930
  4. People v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. In Re WeymannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. People v. CarpenterAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1939
  3. People v. MoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API