Legal Opinion

In Re Keogh-Dwyer

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 6, 1969PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

106 N.J. Super. 567 (1969)

256 A.2d 314

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF WALTER C. KEOGH-DWYER, CANDIDATE FOR GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE FIFTEENTH DISTRICT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided August 6, 1969.

Mr. Walter C. Keogh-Dwyer pro se.

Mr. Wesley L. Lance, attorney for respondent Walter E. Foran.

Mr. Emanuel A. Honig, attorney for respondent Robert E. Littell.

FRITZ, J.S.C.

In the Republican primary election of June 3, 1969 Douglas Gimson, Robert Littell and Walter C. Keogh-Dwyer each sought one of the two Republican nominations for member of the General Assembly from the Fifteenth…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gangemi v. BerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Hoffman v. HockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Kilmurray v. GilfertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. New Jersey Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  5. Lynch v. Borough of EdgewaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Murphy v. State Canvassing BoardWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. MustoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  3. Alongi v. SchatzmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  4. Neil v. KleinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  5. In Re Petition of Fifteen Registered Voters, Cty. of SussexNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API