Legal Opinion
Williams v. Clark County District Attorney
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 2002No. 39897PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*476OPINION
2Per curiam
In this appeal, we examine the statutory residency requirements for the office of county commissioner as well as the requisites for sustaining a residency challenge. Because we conclude that the district court properly allowed the challenge and correctly determined that the statutory residency requirements were not met, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On May 20, 2002, appellant Kevin Michael Williams filed a declaration of candidacy for the office of County Commissioner, Clark County District E. In his declaration, he stated that his actual residence was 3950 Koval Lane,…
3Cases cited30 opinions
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- City Council of Reno v. Reno Newspapers, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Rosenstein v. SteeleNevada Supreme Court · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by31 opinions
- International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Las Vegas Convention & Visitors Authority v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Nevada Public Employees' Retirement Board v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Redl v. Secretary of StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.