Legal Opinion
Monte v. Milat
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 8, 1952PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
17 N.J. Super. 260 (1952)
85 A.2d 822
WOODROW S. MONTE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL J. MILAT, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided January 8, 1952.
Mr. Otmar J. Pellet, attorney for plaintiff.
Mr. Michael J. Milat, pro se (Mr. Samuel J. Davidson, of counsel).
PROCTOR, J.S.C.
The plaintiff seeks to have the defendant ousted from the office of Commissioner of the Housing Authority of the City of Hoboken and to have himself adjudged the legal holder thereof.
The facts disclose that, upon the establishment of the above authority on May 3, 1949, the defendant was appointed commissioner…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Goff v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Pine v. OkzewskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Ackley v. NorcrossSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- Trustees of Free Public Library v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Salter v. BurkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kagan v. CaroselliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- In Re Application of MoffatNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- O'KEEFE v. DunnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Edgewater Park v. Edgewater Park Housing Auth.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- State v. Parking Authority of the City of TrentonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.