Legal Opinion

Coe v. Van Why

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1905No. 4549PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Teller County: Hon. Louis W. Cunningham, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Action for damages for injuries to plaintiff’s husband through defendants’ negligence, which resulted in his death. From a judgment in plaintiff’s favor defendants appeal. Among the assignments of error argued are that the evidence is insufficient to establish the negligence charged against defendants ; that expert evidence was improperly received; and that plaintiff’s counsel, in addressing the jury, abused the privilege -of advocacy. The conclusion reached makes it unnecessary to notice other assignments.

1. Several closely contested questions of fact were submitted to the jury for its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Cosselmon v. . DunfeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Herrin, Lambert & Co. v. DalyMississippi Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Grant v. VarneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  5. Manigold v. Black River Traction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Rains v. RainsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  2. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  3. Vindicator Consolidated Gold Mining Co. v. FirstbrookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  4. Haid v. LoderstedtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Yoast v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API