Legal Opinion
United States v. L. D. Caulk Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 6, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 1372PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This is an action brought under Sec. 4 of the Sherman ■ Act1 charging defendant Caulk, with others, of combining and conspiring to restrain and monopolize trade and commerce in the manufacture and sale of certain commodities in violation of Secs. 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2. For the purposes of this memorandum the allegations of the complaint are not material save that it is alleged that the actions complained of began about the year 1942 and continued up to and including the date of the filing of the complaint, May. 16, 1951. The defendants filed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Sylvania Industrial Corporation v. Visking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Ebel v. DrumDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1944
- Federal Telephone & Radio Corp. v. Associated Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
- Bush v. Pioneer Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
3Cited by12 opinions
- Manual De J. Gomez v. Jerry v. Wilson, Chief of PoliceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Zeigler v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. v. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1970
- Barnett v. Mobile County Personnel Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- United States v. Genevieve RussellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.